Log In | Register
Ever since Andrew Breitbart reminded Occupy protesters at CPAC that their movement had a serious sexual harassment and rape problem, Breitbart and many in his company have been repeatedly making the point as a reminder to a public that has mostly forgotten that Occupy exists that they are not, in the aggregate, the most serious group of political dissenters. This has gotten the attention of some of the lower-tier fringe left, with the latest of these being noted political scholar Alec Baldwin, who added this veritable contribution to politics today: “Andrew Breitbart is a festering boil on the anus of public discourse.”
Alec Baldwin Calls Andrew Breitbart A 'Festering Boil On The Anus Of Public Discourse'
Seeded on Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:56 PM EST
Article Source: mediaite.org- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (174)
I hate it when people are so vague. I wish Alec Baldwin would be more clear about how he feels.
- 68 votes
Damn - now I have to like Baldwin, oh well, not the first time I've changed my mind.
- 35 votes
I couldn't agree with him more!
Hey Alec, if you have an opinion please come out with it!! 8-D
- 35 votes
It's funny because...I was going to say the exact same thing about Bartlett.
- 15 votes
I hope Alec says what he really feels about Breitbart next time rather than candy coating it like he did with this statement.
- 22 votes
I love to read a good rant! Alec should keep up the good work! I love a man who speaks his mind.
- 14 votes
Whose Bartlett?
Pretty sure he is talking about Bruce Bartlett, an economist who worked for Reagan, who keeps going on talk shows and saying that tax cuts don't pay for themselves and deregulation doesn't lead to job growth and the tea party is a danger to america and the republican party. They despise him for his connection to the Reagan admin, and because he turned on the party message, but most of all because he is right.
Here you go.
www.dailykos.com/story/2011/07/28/999759/-Hardball:-Bruce-Bartlett-desroys-every-Republican-fiscal-talking-point-in-5-minutes-?via=siderec
He thinks Obama is a moderate conservative, just like I do. Great video.
- 29 votes
Andrew Breitbart A 'Festering Boil On The Anus Of Public Discourse'
One of them new anti-biotic resistant strains. Just when you thought you saw the last of him, he just randomly pops back up.
- 11 votes
Alec should keep up the good work! I love a man who speaks his mind.
Even to the flight attendent, waitress or maid? There are few reports of Mr. Baldwin holding back from speaking his mind.
- 1 vote
While I really don;t care for Alec, in this case he is spot on! I just gained some respect for Baldwin. Never had any for breifart. Don't see that changing!
- 9 votes
Why was old Alec down there sniffin this mans but in the first place? Is he trying to tell us something we don't already know.
- 4 votes
This seems pretty mild to me. I mean if you're going to be a festering boil, at least the anus is a reasonably discreet location. I wonder if, by anus, Baldwin is referring to the internet.
- 2 votes
While I really don;t care for Alec, in this case he is spot on! I just gained some respect for Baldwin
If you act like an @!$%# toward common people, I don't care about a man's witty talk.
- 2 votes
I LMAO when I read that,
I alway have like Alec Balwin,
Smart man!
- 10 votes
Alec Baldwin has the morals of a baboon and is not one to pass judgement on anyone.
- 8 votes
Alec Baldwin has the morals of a baboon
You may be right, but he still has far higher morals than Andrew Breitbart ever had.
- 18 votes
but he still has far higher morals than Andrew Breitbart ever had.
Really ya ever hear how he talks to his 11 yr old daughter? Have a listen ...
- 6 votes
Whoa Alec dude! (high five)
I am an accomplished smart ALEC, but Baldwin just came up with a criticism that just cannot be out done or more extreme. Now I will somehow have to find a way to get the mental image of this comment out of my head.
- 15 votes
easy mike just listen to him talking to his daughter and imagine he is speaking to your kid or one you know...That should do it!
- 3 votes
mountainmike, I'm with you, the mental picture of a festering boil on Brietbart's butt, will now come to mind when Brietbart's name comes up. Ughly thought, just like Brietbart is.
- 9 votes
space guy
Alec Baldwin has the morals of a baboon and is not one to pass judgement on anyone.
LOL!
The above comment is one I would make about Breitbart and anyone who supports his 'reports'. Baldwin's observation is priceless and applied to Breitbart as well as Breitbart supporters.
OK, yes, Baldwin's parenting skills need work.
- 10 votes
Got a rash?
GOP = skin disease.
Use your vote to get rid of it.
- 10 votes
Read the rest of the article.
Basically, they're condemning Alec Baldwin for making such a childish insult. Meanwhile, they seem to have forgotten that they began their article with "Ever since Andrew Breitbart reminded Occupy protesters at CPAC that their movement had a serious sexual harassment and rape problem, Breitbart and many in his company have been repeatedly making the point as a reminder to a public that has mostly forgotten that Occupy exists that they are not, in the aggregate, the most serious group of political dissenters"
Furthermore, they go on to write off Alec Baldwin by sarcastically calling him a "political scholar". The funny thing about acting... You get paid a lot of money to do a job that doesn't take up that much of your time. You've got a lot of free time. Now, Alec Baldwin has been famously interested in politics for decades now. When you combine these two elements, you've got at least the credentials of an average political pundit, combined with Baldwin's ties to high ranking politicians whom he knows through fundraisers, and writing him off suddenly seems... stupid.
The Right loves to hate Hollywood when actors aren't on their side, but they'll embrace the living hell out of a Kelsey Grammer, Jon Voight, Victoria Jackson, or Chuck Norris. Remember when Huckabee was dragging him around with him everywhere he went?
My point being, Alec Baldwin is ultimately using colorful language to deride someone who's contribution to political discussion in the United States is edit videos and tell flagrant outright lies. Andrew Breitbart hasn't actually broken any major examples of political corruption. He's only taken a few pieces of information out context and fit them to his own narrative. You may not like the metaphor, but you've really gotta come up with something equivalent if you want to accurately describe what Andrew Breitbart does for a living.
- 5 votes
Y'all need to watch the mash-ups Keith has been doing on Countdown on Current TV. They are stellar recombinations of Breitbart's meltdown and famous meltdown in TV/Movie annals. Very funny, and, of course, Andy is the Worst Person in the World - all last week and probably for some months to come.
And Breitbart was also on Cenk's show last week and he looked and sounded like he was a breath away from straight jacket time.
- 3 votes
He was referring to the anus of public discourse; that would be the right wing @!$%#s.
Alec Baldwin was being kind.
Breitbart is the puss draining out of that "Festering Boil On The Anus Of Public Discourse"
The Koch brothers and other wealthy pigs financing this exudation is the festering boil on the anus of public discourse.
- 6 votes
'Festering Boil On The Anus Of Public Discourse'
Hmmm, Baldwin should know all about that! He speaks from experience, yes?
- 3 votes
it's either me, my computer or you gotta try again Jim.
Link works for me ... Just tried it !
- 1 vote
Breitbart's response: http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/18/alec-baldwin-andrew-breitbart-a-festering-boil-on-the-anus-of-public-discourse/
- 4 votes
I guess that's a good comeback if you already like Breitbart... From the perspective of a comedy critic, it's trying to use a topical joke that's several years old. It doesn't really punch today.
- 4 votes
No that's a good comeback...Even if you didn't even know who Breitbart was ... The only think required is to know what a scum ball Alex is and how poorly he treated his own child...
And to be someone that can think past their hate long enough to say to themselves...If he would treat his own child like that how would he treat MINE!
Anyone remember when Alex said this ?
“I’m thinking to myself if we were in other countries, we would all, right now, all of us together, . . . would go down to Washington and we would stone [Republican U.S. Representative] Henry Hyde to death! We would stone him to death! Wait! . . . Shut up! No, shut up! I’m not finished. We would stone Henry Hyde to death, and we would go to their homes and we’d kill their wives and their children. We would kill their families.”
Late Night with Conan O'Brien 2000
- 2 votes
You're not grasping what I'm saying - It requires you to remember a piece of information from a long time ago. It's a bad joke. If you don't understand how jokes work, then...
As for the Henry Hyde comments... Out of line, absolutely. But his point was that if we were in another country, and you had a guy trying to impeach the president over an extramarital affair, and he had an extramarital affair himself... The double standards that Republicans live by and, more importantly, get away with... astounding. Newt Gingrich has more examples than I'd even like to start with. You've got all of these people who are against Sharia Law and the global domination of Islam and yet want to rule the United States from the Bible rather than the constitution.
Yes, Baldwin's comments were out of line, but his point was that in most other countries, the people don't stand for the open hypocrisy that people like Henry Hyde got away with. Hell, Gingrich has come out and said he doesn't need to do the things he tells other people to do.
- 4 votes
Also, Alec Baldwin said he move to Canada if Bush won his election.
Didn't Costa Rica put up posters of Rush in the Airport designating him as a non-protected species of whale and opening the whaling season?
- 5 votes
As for the Henry Hyde comments... Out of line, absolutely. But
Always a but ....
Yes, Baldwin's comments were out of line, but
Kind of it was wrong but .....................followed by some type of justification...
- 1 vote
I don't think Alec Baldwin's comment was out of line at all, if anything he was being too nice.
- 5 votes
I don't think Alec Baldwin's comment was out of line at all, if anything he was being too nice.
What was it the ...
we would stone [Republican U.S. Representative] Henry Hyde to death! We would stone him to death!
Part or the ....
I’m not finished. We would stone Henry Hyde to death, and we would go to their homes and we’d kill their wives and their children. We would kill their families.”
Or the part about killing their wives and children ...That you liked the most?
- 1 vote
Actually I meant the comment that is the TOPIC of this seed, not the off-topic BS from 11 YEARS AGO that YOU brought up.
- 4 votes
off-topic
Sure you praise the lunatic when he says something you like ... but every other crazy ass thing he says that might put his rant into perspective to his personality is ..."off - topic" ...
Just because I like what he said THIS TIME, it doesn't mean that I like everything he says, or even like Alec Baldwin at all.
There are plenty of people out there that I like SOME of what they say or do, that doesn't mean that I'm endorsing everything they've done throughout their entire lives.
I like Mel Gibson's and Clint Eastwood's movies (Usually), but that doesn't mean I personally care for either actor's politics or personality.
But you're bringing up something that Alec Baldwin said that you didn't like from 11 years ago as if it had any relevance at all to the current topic, and that's an absolutely ridiculous position to take.
- 5 votes
Kind of it was wrong but .....................followed by some type of justification...
"I'm going to deflect the question by turning this on you somehow, and not make any attempt to respond to the content"
Dunno where you think you have any sort of moral authority.
- 1 vote
"I'm going to deflect the question by turning this on you somehow, and not make any attempt to respond to the content"
This is in quotations..... who said it ...Not I ! Do you wish to claim that its something I might have said that justifies your then saying .... But its not ...... its just something you fabricated !But the funny thing is .... You in the post I replied to NEVER ASKED A QUESTION! Not 1 !
Dunno where you think you have any sort of moral authority.
No claim was made to have any "moral authority" ....
I made a simple observation ..... As a matter of fact I passed no judgment at all... However it was a nice attempt on your part, to point at me as if I did something wrong ...
Haha... See, there ya go... That's the stuff...
You've got nothing, I'm satisfied now.
- 2 votes
HAHAHAHAHHAHA Yes there I go
And anyone reading your fictitious quote will go to the same place ... And wonder why you wrote something ..put it in quotes and never it was never said by the person to which you were speaking...
They will go to the place where they see that you claim I make a statement of moral authority look for such a statement and FIND NONE ..
Then they will finally go to the place where they see you claim your false victory ... and join me in a hearty Laugh..
That is where I and all that fairly judge our exchange will also go..
Bye Now !
- 2 votes
lol Look at him go! Talking about the fictious quote!
Ooooh, please, please, keep it up... It's like giving gummy worms to a fat kid...
- 1 vote
Isn't Baldwin insulting festering boils? :)
- 26 votes
#3 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:52 PM ESTThus, his credentials verified, we can take his opinion on the matter as definitive. This is not some random opinion of Breibart, but an informed critique by an expert in boiltude, festering or otherwise.
- 2 votes
Short, succinct and to the point. I like it!
- 20 votes
#4 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:57 PM ESTOh sure, edgier that's what I like too. When you're talking Breitbart, there should be no limit to edgy! LOL I thought Alec went pretty easy on him. You know me LOL
- 12 votes
When you're talking Breitbart, there should be no limit to edgy!
When you're talking Breitbart, there should be no limit to edgy pudgy!
- 10 votes
Alec Baldwin is a man that would put peoples lives at stake, when a stewardess asks him to put away his cell phone , and he is so important he dont think he has to . im of an opinion he is an ego maniacal jackass. and wonder if anyone cares what he thinks.
- 1 vote
#5 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 9:03 PM ESTOh please. There hasn't ever been a crash attributed to a cell phone since they became widespread. That notion is stupid as hell.
I'd take what he thinks over that asshat Breitbart any day.
- 18 votes
Cellphones won't make a plane crash.
The most they can do is screw up the navigation a little bit.
- 7 votes
Cellphones won't make a plane crash.
The most they can do is screw up the navigation a little bit.
Not true. Most commercial airliners have a rear camera that is used for backing up the plane, not unlike a Prius. Ordinarily, objects in the camera are closer than they appear. Cell phone usage can disturb the signal in such a way that objects displayed are further than they appear causing pilots who are navigating their plane in reverse to collide with baggage carts, stray stewardesses, what have you. So you should NEVER use your cell phone while your plane is taxiing in reverse on the runway.
- 8 votes
terry,
there has been no cases of a cellphone screwing up navigation at all, let alone a little bit.
- 7 votes
Cell phone usage can disturb the signal in such a way that objects displayed are further than they appear causing pilots who are navigating their plane in reverse to collide with baggage carts, stray stewardesses, what have you. So you should NEVER use your cell phone while your plane is taxiing in reverse on the runway.
CAN. Where's the evidence to show it's happened?
- 3 votes
Having worked around airports I have not noticed a lot of passenger planes backing up. However, I have seen tugs do push back.
- 5 votes
ok guys,
does anyone not think that with the reference to backing up over stray stewardesses that just maybe it was a joke?
- 3 votes
IDK about the "backing up" issue...but I've been on multiple charter flights where a half dozen (or more) people were using their cell phones virtually non-stop from boarding to deplaning...without incident. And no member of the flight crew ever instructed the passengers otherwise or raised an issue/concern about it.
Ultimately, Mr. Baldwin's failure to follow the direction of the flight crew...doesn't lessen the accuracy of his observation regarding Mr. Breitbart.
- 5 votes
Also how much drinks did Baldwin have sounds like a drunk to me they get stupid and as for Breitbart is a drunk and a liar and he used people to spread his lies.
ok guys,
does anyone not think that with the reference to backing up over stray stewardesses that just maybe it was a joke?
Good lord! Was that the ONLY part of it that made you think I was joking? :-)
- 4 votes
“Andrew Breitbart is a festering boil on the anus of public discourse.”
What a compelling statement. It ceratinly validates the claim that the civility and decency of liberal contributions to public discourse as a joke.
- 5 votes
Actually it seems like an accurate assessment of Andrew Breitbart's character.
- 25 votes
What goes around comes around.
Breitbart is just collecting the Karma that he's earned.
- 19 votes
He hasn't yet, Terry. And how dare a dirty liberal attack a person who has made a profession out of attacking a sitting US President and dirty trick playing to a captive audience, The corrupt theives that make up the Republican party, hey, GOP where is all the money you stole from the people, let's investigate that. Sorry, Baldwin's words are way too kind for this POS.
- 5 votes
It ceratinly validates the claim that the civility and decency of liberal contributions to public discourse as a joke.
Wow! All that from a single off-hand comment?
Alright.
Accordingly then... it stands to reason that Mr. Breitbart's body of work certainly validates the claim that conservatives are intellectually dishonest bigots...with nothing of merit to add to the "public discourse"...except lies and empty, desperate partisan rhetoric.
- 7 votes
Accordingly then... it stands to reason that Mr. Breitbart's body of work certainly validates the claim that conservatives are intellectually dishonest bigots...with nothing of merit to add to the "public discourse"...except lies and empty, desperate partisan rhetoric.
That's your opinion. It's also your choice to accept an "off hand" comment from a crass and no talent individual like Baldwin.
- 1 vote
That's your opinion.
Not at all.
While the adjectives and description I offered fit Mr. Breitbart rather nicely...they don't apply to conservatives as an entire group.
In order to demonstrate the absurdity of your accusation...I substituted a few variables...and extrapolated a conclusion about conservatives using the same flawed rational you relied upon to reach your conclusion about liberals.
It's also your choice to accept an "off hand" comment from a crass and no talent individual like Baldwin.
Just as it's your choice to believe Mr. Baldwin has, "no talent".
The fact that Mr. Baldwin has been nominated for an Oscar...and a Tony...and has won multiple Emmy's...multiple Golden Globes...and multiple SAG awards...among others... seems to indicate your choice isn't a very good one. But, you are nonetheless entitled to that choice.
- 4 votes
The fact that Mr. Baldwin has been nominated for an Oscar...and a Tony...and has won multiple Emmy's...multiple Golden Globes...and multiple SAG awards...among others... seems to indicate your choice isn't a very good one. But, you are nonetheless entitled to that choice.
I know that. And I also know there's no accounting for taste.
- 1 vote
I know that.
Than why disparage him as having "no talent"? You may not like his politics...but clearly he has talent.
Funny how someone so concerned about the absence of "civility and decency" just a couple posts back...resorts to empty ad homs when his position is challenged.
I also know there's no accounting for taste
Agreed...but it's irrelevant in the context of discussing his talent . It's been proven time and again...a person can have talent to spare...and have no taste whatsoever.
I'm curious lamplighter....does conservative (and fellow SNL alum) Victoria Jackson speak for all conservatives when broadcasting her birther beliefs?
How about Chuck Norris? When he pens a missive containing extremist rhetoric and promoting (what amounts to a) Theocracy...are his comments a fair measure of conservative "contributions to public discourse"?
Or would that be overstating the issue?
- 4 votes
Funny how someone so concerned about the absence of "civility and decency" just a couple posts back...resorts to empty ad homs when his position is challenged.
Proclaiming that someone has no talent and is crass is is not the equivalent of describing someone is a festering boil...no matter how repulsive the man may be. By stooping to these middle school tatics Baldwin debases himself, not the guy he's excoriating.
I'm curious lamplighter....does conservative (and fellow SNL alum) Victoria Jackson speak for all conservatives when broadcasting her birther beliefs? How about Chuck Norris?
Show me any evidence that either of them ever used Baldwin's method for articulating their observations?
- 1 vote
Proclaiming that someone has no talent and is crass is is not the equivalent of describing someone is a festering boil...
Another deflection.
The fact that your accusations were less "crass"...doesn't negate the fact that you resorted to ad homiem attacks.
You bemoan his lack of "civility and decency"....while SIMULTANEOUSLY...using his comment to make a sweeping denouncement of liberals. Then when I challenged...you resorted to attacking him personally.
Crass or not...there is nothing civil or decent about ad hominem arguments.
Furthermore...while his comment was crass ...there is evidentiary support for his assertion. By your own admission, your attack on his "talent" was entirely baseless.
Show me any evidence that either of them ever used Baldwin's method for articulating their observations?
Yet another deflection. At least this one made me chuckle!
Deflect all you want....if the "method for articulating (an) observation"... justifies the use of a sweeping denouncement against an entire ideology...than certainly the content of an observation justifies the same response...or even greater.
- 2 votes
You bemoan his lack of "civility and decency"....while SIMULTANEOUSLY...using his comment to make a sweeping denouncement of liberals.
What I made is the observation that some people claim that they all empathy, compassion and goodwill ...but only for people who share their worldview...it's open season on all others. And yes, Baldwin fits in that category.
Then when I challenged...you resorted to attacking him personally.
For saying he's a crass and has no talent? He validated the former by his festering boil comment. The latter is just my opinion.
Furthermore...while his comment was crass ...there is evidentiary support for his assertion.
That public discourse has an anus? That people are festering boils on it? I guess ad hominem works in both directions.
Yet another deflection. At least this one made me chuckle!
Chuckle all you want. I still don't see the evidence to back up your claim. I guess your deflection is projection.
Deflect all you want....if the "method for articulating (an) observation"... justifies the use of a sweeping denouncement against an entire ideology...than certainly the content of an observation justifies the same response...or even greater.
In other words...liberals can say whatever they want but can't be called out on it.
For saying he's a crass and has no talent?
No on the former...yes on the latter. Are you that unclear on the concept of what constitutes an ad hominem?
The latter is just my opinion.
Alright...but your opinion...as expressed...is still a personal attack.
I guess ad hominem works in both directions.
To be sure.
Mr. Baldwin directed an ad hominem...you directed one back. Yes...I KNOW...his was more crass. But yours was still an attack against him personally.
Moreover...his was an off-color (and yes crass) idiom...not meant to be interpreted literally.
But your responses have been very literal generalizations and insults directed at liberals as a whole and Mr. Baldwin personally.
I still don't see the evidence to back up your claim.
Again I'm chuckling. You're asking for evidence to support a question I didn't ask!
If you don't want to answer the questions because you painted yourself into a corner w/ your broad brush strokes at the start...fine. But don't blame me for be not providing "evidence" to support a false equivalency that you want to perpetuate.
As if there's a civil and decent "method" for calling the POTUS a Communist...or for promoting lies and insults about his birth place...or advocating for an unconstitutional form of government!
In other words...liberals can say whatever they want but can't be called out on it.
Sweeping generalizations...ad hominems...deflections...projection...red herrings......feigned victimization...wow! I wait with bated breath to see what new logical fallacies lie in store in your next post!
Until then...
- 3 votes
Again I'm chuckling. You're asking for evidence to support a question I didn't ask!
You can't even remember what you wrote...in#6.9
I'm curious lamplighter....does conservative (and fellow SNL alum) Victoria Jackson speak for all conservatives when broadcasting her birther beliefs?
How about Chuck Norris? When he pens a missive containing extremist rhetoric and promoting (what amounts to a) Theocracy...are his comments a fair measure of conservative "contributions to public discourse"?
You can't even remember what you wrote...in#6.9
Your deflections are getting a bit ridicules. Either that or you've avoided the question so long...you've confused yourself.
I'm not asking about the "method" they employed to express their opinions...nor am I asking you to vouch for the specific content contained in their opinions.
I'm asking...is it fair to use their statements....however they were expressed, whatever they contained...to "validate" sweeping generalizations about conservative "contributions to public discourse"?
- 2 votes
For the record...here was your response to my question:
Show me any evidence that either of them ever used Baldwin's method for articulating their observations?
Show me where I asked a question about the "method of articulating an observation"?
Good luck...as I did NOT ask about "methodology" or articulation. I asked whether or not it's appropriate to hold an entire ideology accountable for the opinions of a celebrity who happens to share that ideology.
At this point...I really don't care if you answer the question. I've made my point...and your blatant attempts to deflect/avoid/evade the question speak at least as loudly as any answer you could provide at this point.
- 2 votes
Good luck...as I did NOT ask about "methodology" or articulation. I asked whether or not it's appropriate to hold an entire ideology accountable for the opinions of a celebrity who happens to share that ideology.
That's Ok don't support your arguement with evidence. You can't anyway.
That's Ok don't support your arguement with evidence.
Another nonsensical deflection. I didn't make an argument...I simply asked a question.
And, when I asked...you deflected.
When I called out your deflection...you deflected again.
When I pointed out you were demanding "evidence" to support a false equivalency...you deflected again.
When I said that I didn't care if you even answered the question...unsurprisingly...you deflected yet a-g-a-i-n.
MY (not exactly) BOLD PREDICTION: If you respond to this post...it will contain a deflection!
In retrospect...wouldn't it have been a bit easier for you to simply 'no, right-leaning celebrities don't speak for all conservatives, my attempts to impugn all liberals for Mr. Baldwins crassness was far too broad'?
- 4 votes
You have steered this into one of the most pointless conversations in recent memory. You must be a real hoot at parties.
Anyway, the guy's gone now so I'm sure that makes both you and Baldwin very happy.
- 1 vote
Well color me prescient...you deflected!
You have steered this into ....
Nonsense. Don't blame me because you got out of our conversation... exactly what you put into it.
You must be a real hoot at parties.
Perfect example.
You blame me for the lack of substance in our conversation...then turn right around and post this pointless juvenile insult.
the guy's gone now so I'm sure that makes both you and Baldwin very happy.
This comment would have to improve vastly to qualify as absolutely pathetic.
Believe what you like....I'm not the type to rejoice in someones death.
That said, ultimately I'd rather be the type to rejoice in someones death...than be the type of person who is so desperately partisan that they try to USE another person's death to score political "points".
- 4 votes
Your posts no longer justify a reply...you are now on ignore.
Have great day.
Your posts no longer justify a reply
No longer justify a reply?
Wouldn't you have to actually reply to a post in the first place rather than just continue to deflect in order for that sentence to even make sense?
- 3 votes
Thank You!
At this rate, soon you'll only be seeing the Right Wing posts.
But since those are the only ones you give real answers to, I doubt if it will make much difference to anything you do.
- 4 votes
"You're on the list, you're on the list... You're ALL on my list!"
>:P
- 3 votes
you are now on ignore.
Wise idea.
Since I'm not inclined to allow your ideologically prejudicial BS or your deflections to go unchecked.... and you're unwilling to admit that your initial attack on liberals went too far....putting me on ignore is about the only move you can make at this point.
Have great day.
While I tend to doubt there's any sincerity behind this...I thank you anyway.
- 4 votes
Wide... you're on my list too. Albeit a different type of list. Check your friend requests. :)
- 6 votes
I wouldn't be too honored just yet. Most of my friends are Rush Limbaugh's liberal sluts.
- 5 votes
I thought Alec Baldwin was a festering boil but next to Breitbart he's barely a freckle.
- 7 votes
#10 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 9:37 PM ESTBaldwin just called Breitbart for what he is. A PIECE OF SH!T.
- 11 votes
#11 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:21 PM ESTThat's funny, I wonder if rick santorum and andrew breitbart are brother boils?
- 10 votes
#12 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:43 PM ESTThe Democrats are just pissed because this weasel Brietbart compels them over and over again to do things against their self interest.
Look at Breitbart's big three.
Acorn- Democrats cast the deciding votes to defund them and even bash the group. Without the Democrat's help the GOP would never of won that one. Later they claim Breitbart tricked them. Few have made their rivals kill off one of their own interest groups while dressed up like Fozzy Bear. Claiming you're the lone White pimp dressed up like you stepped out of The Bronx circa 1974, with your 'Ho in tow while asking for tax advice for a child prostitution venture. Wow, you can't make that up!
Sherrod- The Obama administration falls for a poorly edited video and fires Ms. Sherrod on Breitbart's word alone. The administration claims Breitbart tricked them. Having a Presidential administration ax a government official with no investigation at all is quite an accomplishment for a @!$%# stirrer.
Anthony Weiner- After the facts came out, the Democrats had little choice but to @!$%# can one of their best. No claim of trickery with that one. At first every Democrat defended Weiner, justified his actions and trashed Breitbart. Then it turned out he really was sending unsolicited pictures of his penis to young women that only wrote him because they admired his politics.
I don't like the guy and think he is a weasel. But he's good at his game and suckers the Democrats, again and again. That he does it with low budget crappy shtick each time just makes it better.
Who gives a @!$%# what Alec Baldwin thinks? Over the years he has gained quite a reputation as being an @!$%# to those he considers 'the little people', like waitresses, flight attendants and maids. If it was just 4 or 5 stories you might not think much about it. Breitbart has his faults, but you have not heard similar stories about Breitbart from the women that had him as a customer.
- 4 votes
#13 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:45 PM ESTBut he's good at his game
Professional @!$%# stirrer?
Seriously...what will Brietbart's epitaph read? What exactly is his "game?"
- 12 votes
Pride cometh before the fall and Andys a wet brain that already looks more and more like a Nick Nolte Mugshot..
- 6 votes
what will Brietbart's epitaph read?
Political @!$%# stirrer, would get my vote.
The common man's politicial involvment is in the gutter. The days of fraternal organizations and working for local politics, is sadly done for. Now it is about crashing other people's rallys and doing Mic Checks.
- 2 votes
I'll put my pugnacious idiot up against your pugnacious idiot!!! Is this what we've come to?
- 4 votes
Sadly it does appear so Pat ...
My moron is no where near as bad as your moron... And a lot of people sticking their tongues out at each other...I suspect!
- 4 votes
Considering this is the same Breitbart who in 2009 claimed Oprah Winfrey was secretly controlling, only two things I could add to Baldwin's statement:
- insert the words "demented" and "deranged" before the word festering.
- remove the words of public discourse.
A boil in the crack of the human behind could not be a more apt description.
- 5 votes
#15 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:24 PM ESTWow! What a colorful and accurate metaphor. Alec Baldwin is a national treasure.
- 10 votes
#16 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:25 PM ESTAlec Baldwin is a national treasure.
Ah this is the man that Democrats call a "national treasure"
Alec Baldwin's Threatening Message to Daughter
An enraged Alec Baldwin unleashed a volcanic tirade of threats and insults on his 11-year-old daughter, Ireland, calling her a "thoughtless little pig," and bashing her mother Kim Basinger -- and TMZ has obtained the whole thing unfiltered and raw. And we've learned, a family law judge was so alarmed after hearing the tape, she has temporarily barred Baldwin from having any contact with his child.
Here listen to your HERO speak to his 11 yr old daughter ...
If you have the GUTS .... The tell us about your hero..
http://www.aolcdn.com/tmz_audio/0419_baldwin_bleeped.mp3
Calling his 11 yrs old a "rude little pig little pig you really are, a rude thoughtless little pig"
Sorry You Democrats can have him... At least Beritbart is picking on ADULTS not his own little 11 yr old daughter!
Oops. Should read as..
Considering this is the same Breitbart who in 2009 claimed Oprah Winfrey was secretly controlling the White House, only two changes I'd make to Baldwin's statement:
- insert the words "demented" and "deranged" before festering.
- remove all words after anus.
A boil in the crack of the human behind could not be a more apt description.
- 5 votes
#17 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:30 PM ESTMany comments we read today insult people. Fewer people speak today in a civil manner. This is just another indication of the growing depravity in American life. This is caused by the elite liberal media with their daily broadcasts expounding their hatred of traditional moral values. The barbarians brought down the Roman Empire and the same thing is happening to the American Empire by the left-wing haters of anyone who dare to disagreee with their atheistic left wing philosophy -- which is devoid of traditional Christian-Judaic moral values.
#18 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:47 PM ESTGee it seems to be the other way around to me! Christian-Judaic moral values are possessed by the right? That I'd like to see!
- 7 votes
Fighting the wrong fight against the wrong enemy, Bill...
This is caused by the
elite liberalcorporate-controlled media with their daily broadcastsexpounding their hatred of traditional moral valuespandering to the lowest common social denominator, fictionalizing reality, and generally pandering to conflict over substance in the pursuit of ratings and advertising revenue.
Further...
their atheistic left wing philosophy -- which is devoid of traditional Christian-Judaic moral values.
My own "atheistic left-wing philosophy" shares many values (such as relief of the poor and downtrodden, healing for the sick, food for the hungry &c &c) with "traditional Christian-Judaic" morality... it just happens to exclude the type of divisive, tribally-based, and ethically unsound dogmatic limitations that do not contribute to human well-being... and that have somehow been given primacy-of-place in the political "God-talk" utilized by the more politically-religious pseudo-pundits in the crowd.
- 6 votes
Uh, Bill, what country are you talking about? Have you not heard the bashing a sitting US President, duly elected by a majority, has taken since before he even took office. Then in utter amazement a host of you defending any right-wing turd thrower and instigator over the President. The right wing and the scapegoating Republicans have brought corruption and unpatriotism to a whole new and lower level. Shame on the rest of us for our committment to the President, how horribly unamerican we are. How dare you, if these are your values, no wonder the country is where it is today, yes there are very clear divides, that is certain. I'm not ashamed of mine, either.
- 5 votes
Bill,
The Barbarians did not bring down the Roman Empire, the Roman Empire died AFTER it became Christian.
The Barbarians that sacked Rome were led by Roman-trained soldiers using Roman weapons and tactics.
It was Christianity that destroyed the Roman Empire.
- 1 vote
Are you William F.Buckley reincarnate? That was a rather snobby crique of the alleged left.
There is no left. It's an imaginary enemy of those glued to the past.
- 9 votes
#19 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:55 PM ESTAndrew Breitart, he's not too smart. No brain, no heart, trouble, he'll start.
Where will his antics lead? An Obama win, yes indeed.
He'll lead his angry mob awry, revenge is something he will try.
His anger growing as his head explodes, His ears fly off and his brain implodes.
Someday he will leave the race, and another idiot will take his place.
This one is for you Pat!
- 5 votes
#21 - Sun Feb 19, 2012 12:32 AM ESTAt least he doesn't promote fear as a way to convince people to not think for themselves.
- 3 votes
#22 - Sun Feb 19, 2012 12:34 AM ESTAndrew Breitbart, he must do his part, to lead his party to a win.
Now he'll get grimey and very slimey, my patients growing very thin.
We really don't need, this guy to succeed, he's frantic like a crazy hen!
Can't get much meaner, ask Anthony Weiner, he'll come after the dems again.
- 5 votes
#23 - Sun Feb 19, 2012 1:16 AM ESTAnthony Weiner did not bleak the law stupid yes. We can stop Breitbart by calling him out for the lie he spreads. Remember how to deal with a drunk comfort like done on Current TV.
- 1 vote
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
